Rocky Burt wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 09:30 +0100, Max M wrote:
Benji York wrote:
If we want people outside of the zope community to use these components,
they should not have the word "zope" anywhere in their name. If it says
"zope" people will *always* assume it is for use only with/inside Zope
(Zope 2 more often than not).
Would we want people outside the community to do this?
We want as much as the python developer as possible to use pieces of
zope. This means those pieces of zope will have had greater testing,
more reviewing, and ultimately, more people contributing.
I am *not* against other developers using bits of Zope. So I am sort of
being the devils advocate here.
But everytime it is mentioned, it is allways mentioned as a purely good
thing. But it is in fact not without cost.
Eg. conflicting interrests of 'external' and 'internal' users, or code
that becomes more complex because of different use cases.
--
hilsen/regards Max M, Denmark
http://www.mxm.dk/
IT's Mad Science
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
