Yoshinori Okuji wrote:
> On Friday 24 March 2006 17:33, Andreas Jung wrote:
>>>>- it has no maintainer, nobody wants to touch it without gloves
>>>Is that any more true than for lots of other things?
>>Right, but for duplicate functionality that is not widely used and that I
>>consider buggy it is legitimate to propose the deprecation. But as usually
>>I am open to good arguments :-)
> We have been using XML export/import with ERP5 in many production systems
> for a long time. Only this feature allows us to understand changes among
> different versions in a human readable format, and even to edit the contents
> by ordinary text editors. Without this feature, it is nearly impossible to
> work on large systems in a distributed way. XML export/import is so valuable
> to make a bridge between TTW development and distributed development with the
> technology Business Template[2,3].
> To make the feature more convenient, we have locally developed some monkey
> patches[4,5] to Zope so that:
> - the output is more stable (i.e. the order of tags and the reference numbers
> are more stable) to make "diff" usable for human
I did quite a bit of work along these lines for Zope 3. Perhaps
we can find a way to share the Z2 and Z3 code.
> - unicode objects work fine, assuming that data should be encoded in UTF-8
I think the Z3 xml pickle code handles Unicode too.
> We would be happy to submit our patches, if you think they are generally
Perhaps first, we should try the Zope 3 version of xml pickle.
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -