Tres Seaver wrote: > Philipp von Weitershausen wrote: >>> Log message for revision 66185: >>> update to latest revision of ZODB 3.6 for upcoming release > > Should'nt we be tagging a ZODB release for this? I *really* don't like > the practice of releasing a product which has non-tagged dependencies > linked as externals, bound only to a meaning-free revision ID.
Which is why I once suggested to the SVN developers to allow revision IDs have a human-readable alias :). Anyways, since both the 2.9.x and the 3.2.0 release used a meaning-free revision ID of ZODB, I didn't bother and change this practice for 2.9.3/3.2.1 now. If you want to create a ZODB 3.6.1 release, please do so, but it's a lot of work for me right now. I also didn't feel like peeing in someone else's pool since the ZODB was sort of Tim's territory in the past. Philipp _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )