--On 13. April 2006 15:58:44 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the "big" solution would take a considerable effort. It's less than three weeks before feature freeze. That is very little time even for the "small" solution.Big or small? Would this be an optional and configurable feature or replacement of the current infrastructure?I think it'd be technically possible to have both solutions coexist. After all, that's what we're doing in Zope 3. zope.app.twisted and zope.app.server can coexist easily, I don't see why it shouldn't be possible in Zope 2.
They must coexist in any case. We can not get rid or replace a major component - neither without breaking compatibility nor without deprecation. -aj -- ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376 E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )