--On 18. April 2006 18:52:10 +0200 Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Alec Mitchell wrote at 2006-4-17 14:53 -0700:
Yes, it does sound like a better solution.  However, the issue I see
with it is that it is essentially adding new functionality, rather
than fixing a problem with the existing behavior.  That would seem to
make it a much less likely candidate for getting into zope 2.8.7
(which is important IMHO), despite the fact that it is a bit more

It is a new functionality -- but one that does nothing until it
is used and only for those applications (like "five:traversal")
that use it.

Thus, even a strict release manager might accept it.

Am I strict? :-)


Attachment: pgpUImvsRhSjW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to