-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Chris Withers wrote:
> 
>>The implicit change to make them all 64-bits which results in some 
>>unknown slowdown for all "I" BTree users seems a bit too scary to bite 
>>off...
> 
> 
> Has anyone done any benchmarks to prove that 64-bits is slower or
> faster? It would be interesting to see benchmarks on modern 32bit
> and a 64bit systems. Until then it's all hand-waiving.

Sure, but the "burden of proof" needs to be on the party proposing the
cnange.  "First, do no harm" is a good principle in such cases.


Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver          +1 202-558-7113          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palladion Software   "Excellence by Design"    http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFERpCv+gerLs4ltQ4RAuoIAJ9fKveUfI54DtYWnD9pWDudhqf5LACgmZu1
GFD9FgvQDR9BdvIyTpIm2tI=
=QgmO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to