I have bad experence with tempstorage on ZEO (FileStorage with no undo).
With site with 18000 users (300 per minutes) , the site hang because of conflict on ZEO.
I am very interested by a faster tempstorage like SQLDB


Eric Brun


Chris McDonough a écrit :
I've done this (at least with FileStorage) and it's sllllllooooooooowwww. Might be OK for low-traffic sites, but better to implement a custom session data container that stores stuff in SQL. I have the beginnings of one of these if you want to see it.

- C

On May 31, 2006, at 9:44 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:

On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:40:01AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
| Should be OK, although if you're doing it because you want a "fast"
| storage (or one that "produces fewer conflicts"), ZEO takes away much
| hope of that intrinsically.

My goal was actually sharing sessions between zeo clients, without
resorting to zsqlsessions or similar.

--Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systems                http://enfoldsystems.com
Fax +1 832 201 8856     Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214

For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to