I have bad experence with tempstorage on ZEO (FileStorage with no undo).
With site with 18000 users (300 per minutes) , the site hang because of
conflict on ZEO.
I am very interested by a faster tempstorage like SQLDB
Chris McDonough a écrit :
I've done this (at least with FileStorage) and it's
sllllllooooooooowwww. Might be OK for low-traffic sites, but better
to implement a custom session data container that stores stuff in
SQL. I have the beginnings of one of these if you want to see it.
On May 31, 2006, at 9:44 AM, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:40:01AM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
| Should be OK, although if you're doing it because you want a "fast"
| storage (or one that "produces fewer conflicts"), ZEO takes away much
| hope of that intrinsically.
My goal was actually sharing sessions between zeo clients, without
resorting to zsqlsessions or similar.
--Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systems http://enfoldsystems.com
Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -