On Wed, 2006-14-06 at 13:34 +0200, Lennart Regebro wrote: > The majority has agreed that the path forward for Zope is to make it > possible for people to use Zope3 technologies without having to > rewrite everything from scratch. The changes you see in Zope2 are a > direct effect of that. You should only get upgrade problems if you > skip several versions. Other than that, it should pretty much just > work.
I'd just like to add that I agree with all points in this post. Plone is also in a very similar situation and it was quite minimal work getting from 2.8 to 2.9 and now to 2.10. The result is that Plone is now using more and more component architecture functionality which is making certain area's easier to maintain and is currently making things more fun to code :) As well, the switch to zope 3 technologies is enabling us reuse more zope tech so we have to develop less plone tech which is always a good thing. - Rocky -- Rocky Burt ServerZen Software -- http://www.serverzen.com News About The Server (blog) -- http://www.serverzen.net
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )