--On 28. September 2006 06:32:32 +0200 Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On 27. September 2006 15:09:13 -0400 Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Jonathan wrote: ...From a 'robustness' and 'sleep-better-at-nite' perspective I would rather spend the time making sure the application is rock-solid (by replacing the zclasses once and for all) and not have to worry about this issue everytime a new release of zope is installed.Right. Applications that are gooing to be maintained over the long term should not use ZClasses, for a lot of reasons.That is exactly the case and because of this we must tell the people: ZClasses are a one-way road - no way out.
But you might also go to Zope Corp. with a bag full of money and say: "Hey,ZClasses are important for me and my business. Could we make a project in order to get ZClasses in a better shape?"...depending on what's inside the bag, ZC might say yes or no :-)
Andreas -- ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376 E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )