-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> On 20 Jun 2007, at 12:20 , Andreas Jung wrote:
>> --On 20. Juni 2007 12:04:26 +0200 Philipp von Weitershausen
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Are there any outstanding issues on that Zope211-3.4-integration
>>> If not, I'd like to see it merged, now that ZODB 3.8 has beta'ed.
>> The only outstanding issues are ZClasses. If we merge this branch
>> on the trunk we will have a broken trunk.
> IIRC, the ZClass test already breaks on the Zope 2 trunk (in fact, it
> breaks all the way down to the Zope 2.9 branch). If that's indeed the
> case, our branch wouldn't change anything, would it :).
> Btw, if I interpret http://svn.zope.org/?rev=76390&view=rev
> correctly, it sounds like Tres has found a solution to that ZClass
> bug. We just need to propogate the patch to Zope 3.3/2.10 and trunk/
> trunk. Right, Tres?
What I fixed was the unique-to-2.9 breakage due to the fact that
'Implements' objects couldn't be pickled. The 2.9 ZClass tests now fail
in exactly the same way as the 2.10 / trunk tests.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -