Stephan Richter wrote:

> I think the application control namespace code could simply be moved to
>, since the latter package does needs
> zope.traversing anyways.

True, but I don't see how to do this cleanly as long as the namespace
handler for the etc namespace is implemented as straight-forward as it is
now. Have we reached the point where we want to introduce that registry
the comment in zope.traversing.namespace.etc.traverse suggests?


Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to