Previously Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Christian Theune wrote:
> >Martijn Faassen schrieb:
> >>It's a clear DRY violation, the name of the package (and even the
> >>version number) repeats here.
> >It's not clear to me that it's a DRY violation (see my argument that
> >those functions are actually orthogonal).
> The rule for the most common use case is now:
> If you want to develop a package, add it to 'develop' *and* create a
> versions section if it doesn't exist, let the 'versions' line in
> [buildout] point to it, and add the "package_name = " to it.
> I see a repetition in the package name here. You list it in two places.
> I think that's a DRY violation given that wanting a package listed in
> develop to be picked up is the most common use case.
That highly depends on how you work. I normally do not pin to exact
revisions but to ranges, which work just fun with dev eggs.
If you don't want to pin something - remove the pin. Don't expect
something to magically make your pin go away.
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -