On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 09:56:38AM -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
>
> On Jun 6, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Fred Drake wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Benji York <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I avoided suggesting this earlier, but perhaps we need to define a  
>>> level
>>> to run the tests at.  Then buildbot could run all tests at level X  
>>> and
>>> below and you could put the truly long-running tests above X.
>>
>> Another approach would be to have the buildbot run a bin/buildbot-test
>> instead of bin/test, if present.  That let's the package suggest what
>> makes sense for running under buildbot without having to get people to
>> agree on how "levels" are used (a more complicated issue).
>
> Huh, that sounds like it might be easy-ish for Christian, putting the  
> responsibility where it arguably should be, on the package maintainer.  
> +1, if Christian says it's easy for him.

Sounds easy to do. Putting that on my list.

-- 
Christian Theune · [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to