On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:35:17AM +0300, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 09:34:30AM -0400, Gary Poster wrote:
> > On Jun 6, 2008, at 8:37 AM, Benji York wrote:
> >> A suggestion: I'd like to have the tests run with --all.
> > Heh, I was going to try and fix a time-out failure (zc.blist) by moving
> > the intentionally long tests to --all...maybe there would be some way to
> > say "don't run me with --all"? Otherwise don't love this idea, though I
> > understand its point.
> There are two ways to avoid buildbot timeouts:
> * pass the -v option to the test runner (when buildout sees dots
> appearing it resets its timeout counter, and the dots themselves do
> not obscure errors in the log)
> * increase the buildbot timeout (pass timeout=60*60 to the step that
> runs the tests)
I opted for using -v for now. We'll see how that goes.
> If even buildbot, who has the patience of a computer, is not running
> tests that take a long time, will anyone else ever run them?
Christian Theune · [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -