-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Christian Theune wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 11:09:17PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> If I know I normally only have to check the bottom (or top) of each
>> section to see whether something got added since last time I checked,
>> there's less chance I'll miss it and make a mistake.
>> It's not a major point, but it'd be nice if everybody acted more or
>> less the same instead of changelog sections growing from both ends.
> Sure. It's not the major target group either. During development I tend to use
> SVN to find the changes since last time I looked.
> Between releases the ordering is mostly important on the release level, not
> inside as releases are the atomic step for people to update to.
> My preference would be to have more important changes first.
Please don't make it a judgement call: keep it time-descending order,
just like the releases. Among other things, this makes merge conflicts
more obvious, and easier to to fix.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -