-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Laurence Rowe wrote:
>> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>>> I just looked at the PyPI page of 'transaction':
>>>> And I see some weirdnesses:
>>>> * it's called 'transaction 1.0a1'
>>>> * the 'changes' claim however:
>>>> 1.0 (unreleased)
>>>> What's up? Clearly something went wrong during the releasing of this
>>>> package, at least documentation-wise. Should be fixed.
>>> The documentation is wrong indeed.
>>>> Note that zope.sqlalchemy pulls in this package as a dependency, even
>>>> though I don't think ZODB 3.8 comes with that version of transaction...
>>> The transaction module has been moved out of the ZODB egg for ZODB trunk
>>> aka 3.9 as far as I know.
>>> That means the stand-alone transaction package can probably not be used
>>> with any ZODB 3.8 versions.
>>> But except the wrong documentation, I don't see a problem with the
>>> release as such. IIRC someone wanted to use it outside the ZODB and it
>>> was moved out and got an early alpha release.
>> The dependency lets us run the tests easily. It's quite stable, so it
>> doesn't seem to cause any problems if it gets downloaded into a zope
>> 2.10 buildout. You can always use the additional-fake-eggs =
>> transaction if it's a problem.
> transaction is also used by repoze.tm in non-Zope environments such as
> TurboGears 2 and Pylons. Those tend to not use buildout and certainly
> don't want to see all of zope.* pulled in.
repoze.tm2 is the "stripped down" version which depends only on the
separate 'transaction' package. The original 'repoze.tm' depends on ZODB3.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -