Roger, you make excellent sense here. The other issue of course is the 
testing setup. So there is potential to operate here on a few levels to 
achieve something that makes much better sense for moving forward.

Roger Ineichen wrote:

> I think the cleanup isn't really needed for zope packages itself.
> It's more a question how other can reuse small parts of our
> component architecture without to load everything.
> My personal meaning is, we already have a component architecture
> but we need to split it in a different way into reusable components.
> Such a split could probably not be done earlier because we didn't
> see all the usecases. But now since we have grok, repoze and z3c 
> we have many more options to reuse other components and this makes
> it much clearer what we have to provide as reusable and what not. 
> Regards
> Roger Ineichen
>> -aj

Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to