Roger, you make excellent sense here. The other issue of course is the
testing setup. So there is potential to operate here on a few levels to
achieve something that makes much better sense for moving forward.
Roger Ineichen wrote:
> I think the cleanup isn't really needed for zope packages itself.
> It's more a question how other can reuse small parts of our
> component architecture without to load everything.
> My personal meaning is, we already have a component architecture
> but we need to split it in a different way into reusable components.
> Such a split could probably not be done earlier because we didn't
> see all the usecases. But now since we have grok, repoze and z3c
> we have many more options to reuse other components and this makes
> it much clearer what we have to provide as reusable and what not.
> Roger Ineichen
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -