Benji York wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Stephan Richter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For several packages we took the following approach. Most packages that have
>> browser packages are in; for example, (we did not
>> convert this package yet). We then took the API and moved it to zope.folder.
> Maybe we should create a new namespace package for "browser" code.
> How about "zope.browser"?


My general sentiment is against creating more structure than we already 
have. Flat is better than nested. IMHO it's perfectly ok to have the 
Python APIs in and browser code in I think sooner 
than later people won't want to the* stuff anyway.

Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to