Andreas Jung wrote:
> 
> This is a big issue? I don't think so. Disks are cheap and usually you 
> don't get in touch with the dependent modules under the hood - except 
> for debugging :-)

I don't agree. I think making the dependencies fewer would result is 
easier re-use of bits of "zope", which grows their community and 
hopefully ups their quality.

If this goes well, we might even see robust seperation of packets making 
the KGS unnecessary...

Chris - well, I can always dream ;-)

-- 
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
            - http://www.simplistix.co.uk

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to