What's the actual issue with lxml? It's not that hard to compile it (I'm the person that compiles the official releases), just a little bit under-documented.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Roger Ineichen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Malthe, Stephan > > I decided after along night, trying to compile > lxml on a windows box, that we will not use > lxml and lxml based packages like z3c.form, > z3c.template, z3c.macro etc at some of our > windows servers. > > We have to find a strategy to keep this packages > free of lxml and implement the z3c.pt support in > this packages in a different way. > > I really like your lxml based z3c.pt work. It's > nice and incredible fast. > > What do you think about that? > > I know it's a hugh amount of work, but I'm willing > to help with the refactoring if you like. > > > Regards > Roger Ineichen > _____________________________ > END OF MESSAGE > > _______________________________________________ > Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev > ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** > (Related lists - > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce > http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope ) > -- Sidnei da Silva Enfold Systems http://enfoldsystems.com Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214 _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )