What's the actual issue with lxml? It's not that hard to compile it
(I'm the person that compiles the official releases), just a little
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Roger Ineichen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Malthe, Stephan
> I decided after along night, trying to compile
> lxml on a windows box, that we will not use
> lxml and lxml based packages like z3c.form,
> z3c.template, z3c.macro etc at some of our
> windows servers.
> We have to find a strategy to keep this packages
> free of lxml and implement the z3c.pt support in
> this packages in a different way.
> I really like your lxml based z3c.pt work. It's
> nice and incredible fast.
> What do you think about that?
> I know it's a hugh amount of work, but I'm willing
> to help with the refactoring if you like.
> Roger Ineichen
> END OF MESSAGE
> Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Sidnei da Silva
Enfold Systems http://enfoldsystems.com
Fax +1 832 201 8856 Office +1 713 942 2377 Ext 214
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -