On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:20:10AM -0800, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Monday 02 February 2009, Dan Korostelev wrote:
> > 2009/2/2 Stephan Richter <srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu>:
> > > Yeah, the unversioned links are the only ones that I did not maintain.
> > > You now use a reference to the version directly.
> >
> > BTW, why so? It's quite handy to be able to say - "just use the latest
> > release from the 3.4 branch, whatever version number it has", because
> > there are bug fixes and no backward-incompatibilites expected.
> Nobody reacted to my E-mail when I asked for feedback.

Does that surprise you?

(BTW I reacted.  I didn't say I was personally going to be in a lot of
pain, but I suggested keeping old URLs working the cheapest way I could
imagine -- via Apache rewrite rules.)

> It was extra work and I 
> tried to limit the scope of coding as much as possible. You don't want to 
> know how much time I put into this release as it is.

And we're immensely grateful.

Marius Gedminas
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3 consulting and development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to