Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 17:48, Martijn Faassen <faas...@startifact.com> wrote: >> Note that the Zope Steering group is not about >> packages that are not in the framework, so if lovely.remotetask isn't >> there, it can say little. > > Which is exactly my point. It surely isn't at the moment, and I don't > see that it should be any time soon. What Hermann suggested is > somebody that keeps track of all Zope software modules and tells him > which is good and which is bad. That's not what you suggested, and as > mention, I don't think it's even possible, and definitely not a good > idea.
I think it would be possible to provide an infrastructure so that people who care about communicating certain bits of information ("this package exists and here is its documentation", "this package is really not maintained and therefore deprecated") could do so. Perhaps this infrastructure will be developed as a side-effect of what needs to be done for those libraries in the Zope Framework anyway. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )