Dan Korostelev wrote:
> 2009/3/4 Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com>:
>>>> Note that I'm not actually proposing that we merge this branch any time
>>>> soon: it is a bit of a straw man for the ongoing process conversation.
>>> Why not? It looks that it's just a dependency cleanup, so it can be
>>> merged (and released!) really soon (if noone objects, of course). I
>>> personally don't like long-living branches and forks.
>> Well, part of the dependency cleanup involves making a possibly-
>> controversial coding style change ("from imports"),
> Will it cause any problems in packages that use existing
> zope.component with its current coding style? If not, then why can it
> be a problem?
Because Jim doesn't like "from" imports. :)
I do like from imports just fine, especially if they allow us dumping
zope.deferredimport (which I didn't realize needed zope.proxy, ugh), so
+1 from me.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -