Dan Korostelev wrote:
> 2009/3/4 Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com>:
>>>> Note that I'm not actually proposing that we merge this branch any time
>>>> soon:  it is a bit of a straw man for the ongoing process conversation.
>>> Why not? It looks that it's just a dependency cleanup, so it can be
>>> merged (and released!) really soon (if noone objects, of course). I
>>> personally don't like long-living branches and forks.
>> Well, part of the dependency cleanup involves making a possibly-
>> controversial coding style change ("from imports"),
> Will it cause any problems in packages that use existing
> zope.component with its current coding style? If not, then why can it
> be a problem?

Because Jim doesn't like "from" imports. :)

I do like from imports just fine, especially if they allow us dumping 
zope.deferredimport (which I didn't realize needed zope.proxy, ugh), so 
+1 from me.



Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to