2009/3/4 Martijn Faassen <faas...@startifact.com>:
> Dan Korostelev wrote:
>> 2009/3/4 Tres Seaver <tsea...@palladion.com>:
>>>>> Note that I'm not actually proposing that we merge this branch any time
>>>>> soon:  it is a bit of a straw man for the ongoing process conversation.
>>>> Why not? It looks that it's just a dependency cleanup, so it can be
>>>> merged (and released!) really soon (if noone objects, of course). I
>>>> personally don't like long-living branches and forks.
>>> Well, part of the dependency cleanup involves making a possibly-
>>> controversial coding style change ("from imports"),
>> Will it cause any problems in packages that use existing
>> zope.component with its current coding style? If not, then why can it
>> be a problem?
> Because Jim doesn't like "from" imports. :)

I think, it's can be important when we talking about some "coding
style standard", but when from imports are used as a tool to achieve
specific need, I don't think that Jim will object. :)

+1 on dropping zope.deferredimport+zope.proxy dependency ASAP.

WBR, Dan Korostelev
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to