Chris Withers wrote: > Martijn Faassen wrote: >> I think we can only make the correct determination if we get an idea of >> the performance implications. If it turns out the C code brings >> significant speedups in real-world applications, we should create a >> zope.hookable with a Python + C implementation. > > Even if it does bring significant speedups, why does it need to be a > seperate package?
It doesn't, but it's already a package that could be easily turned into something with proper documentation (it's mostly there, just hidden), and one of the goals was to reduce C dependencies in zope.component, not add C code to it. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )