Chris Withers wrote:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> I think we can only make the correct determination if we get an idea of 
>> the performance implications. If it turns out the C code brings 
>> significant speedups in real-world applications, we should create a 
>> zope.hookable with a Python + C implementation. 
> Even if it does bring significant speedups, why does it need to be a 
> seperate package?

It doesn't, but it's already a package that could be easily turned into 
something with proper documentation (it's mostly there, just hidden), 
and one of the goals was to reduce C dependencies in zope.component, not 
add C code to it.



Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to