Previously Martijn Faassen wrote:
> I therefore think is one package we should be looking 
> to get rid of eventually by splitting it up among a lot of 'testing' 
> modules in individual packages. This way we won't have
> sitting at an edge against our whole dependency tree. Since this is a 
> lot of work this will be an ongoing project but we could at least agree 
> we *want* to do this.
> Opinions?

I would like to see a move away from zope testing frameworks to a more
standard testing infrastructure: test, possibly combined with
using nose.


Wichert Akkerman <>    It is simple to make things.                   It is hard to make things simple.
Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to