Previously Martijn Faassen wrote:
> I therefore think zope.app.testing is one package we should be looking 
> to get rid of eventually by splitting it up among a lot of 'testing' 
> modules in individual packages. This way we won't have zope.app.testing
> sitting at an edge against our whole dependency tree. Since this is a 
> lot of work this will be an ongoing project but we could at least agree 
> we *want* to do this.
> 
> Opinions?

I would like to see a move away from zope testing frameworks to a more
standard testing infrastructure: setup.py test, possibly combined with
using nose.

Wichert.

-- 
Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net>    It is simple to make things.
http://www.wiggy.net/                   It is hard to make things simple.
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to