On Mar 6, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Hi there,
> Thanks Gary for sketching our the zc.async usecase. Note that zc.async
> isn't in the Zope Framework at this point in time so it wouldn't be
> directly affected by this policy, but it's still a useful usecase of
Right, that was the intent.
> * we are going to work at getting rid of the zope.app.testing extra by
> distributing its facilities into individual zope.* packages. Hopefully
> we can get a clear consensus on this one from the people who object to
> the general policy.
> * if you think a new "extra" dependency is needed in a Zope Framework
> package, and you're not just moving stuff between packages but
> developing new code, bring it up on zope-dev so we can at least
> alternatives. Perhaps a better home can be found for this code.
> * on a case-by-case basis we can consider removing extra dependencies
> for particular Zope Framework packages, just like what we're doing
> now for zope.component. We'll discuss that whenever needed. I'll of
> course be biased in favor of such removal, but I can be convinced
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -