-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dieter Maurer wrote: > Tres Seaver wrote at 2009-3-12 14:25 -0400: >> ... >> Sorry, I meant "mandatory tests which load ZCML." I'm actually against >> ever loading ZCML in tests at all. > > If you ship ZCML, you should test it, no?
Not necessarily: in fact, if testing it means that users of my package have to accept a big dogpile of dependencies that they otherwise wouldn't need to, then no. I can easily imagine shipping ZCML in the form I outline below in a package which itself doesn't depend on zope.configuration at all, for instance. > You will not ship ZCML, but this may not apply to everybody.... I likely won't ship ZCML inside a reusable library (as opposed to a deployable application): if I do, it will probably be not a "convenience" that I make everybody include (not my definition of convenience, anyway) but an example which I expect they can either include or *copy and change*. Tres. - -- =================================================================== Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJusAW+gerLs4ltQ4RAv0wAKCJg83M2fgdaunXS9b8PZysJDHLrgCg0MHQ 6+VxRild3DMB5y8PYJ7RK1s= =a3Ax -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )