On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 01:33 +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote: > Hi there, > > Jim Fulton wrote: > > There's been some discussion recently about separating the interfaces > > in zope.publisher from the implementations to facilitate other > > implementations. > > > > I think it would be great to standardize request and response APIs. > > I'd love to see this extend beyond the Zope community. I believe > > that there have been some moves to try to do this at the WSGI level, > > although I haven't kept up with the discussion. > > See WebOb for Ian Bicking's effort (who did investigate a lot of these > APIs including ours in that effort). WebOb is very widely adopted in the > WSGI community already and I see no realistic way for us to make any > headway there now that it is established. I believe that Pylons, > TurboGears 2, repoze.bfg and restish all use it. > > WebOb is more than an interface but also an implementation and in that > sense is quite a bit like our zope.publisher. Even though it's a > specific implementation it's on top of WSGI so people can adopt it > easily. I think it would be very interesting to look for ways to make > bits of Zope work with WebOb somehow.
@Martijn: This thread somewhat overlapped with the forming of the steering group. Do you think this should go to the list of open issues? -- Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )