Christian Theune wrote:
> I remember that at the sprint we used to identify packages which are
> "always good". E.g. zope.interface is a declared no-brainer to add to
> your dependencies. The other two that keep popping up that we *might*
> wanna white-list are zope.schema and zope.component.

To whitelist zope.component would be quite interesting.  As I recall, 
there was a time when all packages that depended on zope.component were 
required to be in the namespace.

I don't object to the idea, though.  We're using zope.schema and 
zope.component almost like language features.

Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to