On Apr 6, 2009, at 6:51 AM, Chris Withers wrote:

> Martijn Pieters wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:53, Wichert Akkerman <wich...@wiggy.net>  
>> wrote:
>>>> Note that we are now up to svn 1.6.
>>> Which still does not fix this, and is preventing people from  
>>> upgrading
>>> to the 1.5 client, and thus from using checkouts using relative  
>>> paths.
>> Bugger, that is indeed correct. I may not have any problems (and a
>> workaround for svn bug 3119) but that doesn't mean we can ask other
>> people that need access to more tightly ACL-ed repositories to put up
>> with subversion 1.5 and 1.6.
> To be honest, the state of svn 1.5 is what's getting me to think about
> looking at mercurial.
> (bzr didn't take my fancy, and hg is gonna be used by the python-core
> folks, so I might as well learn that...)
> Sadly, I suspect none of the tools are as advanced as TortoiseSVN.  
> Which
> is a real shame :-( Perforce maybe? ;-)

Fair enough that bzr didn't take your fancy, but FWIW, did you try  
TortoiseBzr?  That has received love relatively recently.


Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to