Roger Ineichen wrote: >> Betreff: [Zope-dev] who wants to maintain Zope 3? >> Is anyone interested in maintaining Zope 3?
/me is certainly not >> With Zope 3 I mean: > > I think we should take a look if we can build a minimal > setup which Plone, Grok and other projects can use. Do you think > there could be such a based configuration? Or is there to much > difference in each of Plone, Grok, repoze etc? The "minimal setup" is called Zope Toolkit. None of the mentioned projects is interested in any of the Zope 3 packages, except where those are still tied into the whole. >> If nobody is interested, we should perhaps stop talking about >> it entirely. If people are just interested in the ZMI, >> perhaps we should form a ZMI project. +1, to declaring Zope 3 dead. That should allow us to refactor the remaining packages much more aggressively and reduce the dependencies. > The question is, can we find browser page pattern which Grok, > Plone, repoze and others can use? Everybody needs to have at > least management views for manage the components they install > in some ways. So the question is not if we skip the ZMI or not. I don't see any example where something in this direction could be shared. The entire model of "context/@@standard_macros" to provide a unified look and feel hasn't worked out, from what I can tell. On the technical side at least Plone is going to switch over to Chameleon as its page template story and use Grok patterns for building pages. I don't think this kind of buy-in is something everyone else is willing to share. Hanno _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )