On Sunday 19 April 2009, Tres Seaver wrote:
> -1. As a branding choice (as opposed to a technology), "Zope 3" *is* a
> dead-end: it implies a strategy (replacing Zope 2) which we no longer
> believe in. I think the consequences of the brand confusion are hard
> for those uf us "inside" to estimate, but they are far from trivial.
I never communicated to anyone that I believe that Zope 3 is a successor of
Zope 2. Other people pushed that message.
> Continuing to "push" that brand is confusing to outsiders, who don't
> understand why anyone would still be using "Zope 2" four years after the
> first release of "Zope 3". The folks who are using "Zope 3" can
> certainly cope with a split / rename.
That's easy for you to say, since you have no vested interest.
Web Software Design, Development and Training
Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter"
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -