On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 21:38 -0700, Stephan Richter wrote: > On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Michael Howitz wrote: > > Any comments on this implementation? > > +1 from me, since I hate having zope.formlib around. However, this might be > self-serving and we should hear from people not using newer UI patterns. > > > Should I do the include > > <include package="z3c.template" file="meta.zcml" /> > > in zope.app.exception's configure.zcml or only in the ftesting.zcml? > > Just in ftesting.zcml should be fine in my opinion.
Honestly, I'm having trouble arguing for either scenario exclusively. I'm somewhat expecting that doing <include package="xy"/> will cause this package to do everything it needs to activate its configuration. E.g. z3c.form is partially painful because one has to do the same work over and over again in figuring out which depending libraries need to be configured. -- Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )