Marius Gedminas wrote: > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 08:59:34PM +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote: >> What about simply calling it zope.view? (I don't like the plural in >> package names either generally) > > FWIW at some point I decided that singular is appropriate when a package > defines a concept, and plural is appropriate when a package provides > multiple implementations of that concept. > > Thus you have zope.interface but zope.$anything.interfaces.
In this case it's a plural of metaconfiguration. Maybe "zope.viewzcml"? I think that would express the intent even better. Shane _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )