Matthew Wilkes wrote:
> On 28 May 2009, at 12:39, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> * Hm, I wonder whether it has something to do with local utilities.
> I don't think I'd make this jump.  I'd not be averse to a longer  
> package name if it made it more explicit.

I wasn't primarily talking about a package name, but about the name for 
the concept (which can then be reflected class names, and a package 
name, if such a package is necessary).



Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to