Matthew Wilkes wrote:
> On 28 May 2009, at 12:39, Martijn Faassen wrote:
>> * Hm, I wonder whether it has something to do with local utilities.
> I don't think I'd make this jump. I'd not be averse to a longer
> package name if it made it more explicit.
I wasn't primarily talking about a package name, but about the name for
the concept (which can then be reflected class names, and a package
name, if such a package is necessary).
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -