On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 13:04 -0600, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
> > Why?  traverseName is part of zope.app.publication's implementation.   
> > Now it's oddly split off in a very separate package.
> The publisher traversal code is very similar to the code in
> zope.traversing, so I thought the best thing to do is put it in the same
> package as zope.traversing, so that traversal would be maintained in one
> place.

I think there's a valid goal around here. Publisher traversal and
traversal as used in templates have two different implementations that
partly overlap at some points and its hard to explain why there are two
of them. 

I'm not sure whether we can get a single unified implementation, but for
me that would be nice.


Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 7 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to