On Jun 23, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Jun 23, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>>> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>>> They wouldn't. They don't use the URL traversal code. Non-URL
>>>> traversal code would move to zope.tales. zope.container would
>>>> depend on zope.tales rather than on zope.traversing.
>>> For my own education, I would like to understand why it makes
>>> sense for zope.container to depend on zope.tales. This dependency
>>> suggests people need to understand ZPT in order to understand
>>> container relationships, which seems wrong to me.
>> Because it provides traversal adapters needed soley by zope.tales.
> Sorry, you lost me on the first sentence (and the rest doesn't make
> sense yet to me as a result). You first said that zope.container is
> going to depend on zope.tales. Now you're saying zope.tales is
> going to depend on zope.container. If you meant the latter, then I
> understand. :-)
Where did I say that zope.tales is going to depend on zope.container?
It would have been more precise if I has said that "it provides
traversal adapters used soley by zope.tales". zope.containers
provides adapters to do path traversal. ZPT is the only thing that
does path traversal.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -