On Jun 23, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:

> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Jun 23, 2009, at 2:36 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>>> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>>> They wouldn't. They don't use the URL traversal code. Non-URL   
>>>> traversal code would move to zope.tales. zope.container would  
>>>> depend  on zope.tales rather than on zope.traversing.
>>>
>>> For my own education, I would like to understand why it makes  
>>> sense for zope.container to depend on zope.tales.  This dependency  
>>> suggests people need to understand ZPT in order to understand  
>>> container relationships, which seems wrong to me.
>> Because it provides traversal adapters needed soley by zope.tales.
>
> Sorry, you lost me on the first sentence (and the rest doesn't make  
> sense yet to me as a result).  You first said that zope.container is  
> going to depend on zope.tales.  Now you're saying zope.tales is  
> going to depend on zope.container.  If you meant the latter, then I  
> understand. :-)


Where did I say that zope.tales is going to depend on zope.container?   
It would have been more precise if I has said that "it provides  
traversal adapters used soley by zope.tales".  zope.containers  
provides adapters to do path traversal.  ZPT is the only thing that  
does path traversal.

Jim
--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation


_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to