Hi Roger, Roger Ineichen wrote: >>> I'm really not sure if this is working, but does this make >>> >> sense to you? >> >>> Regards >>> Roger Ineichen >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Thanks for the comment. For this particular use case it won't >> work without the context,. The context is used to look up >> further objects in the containment hierarchy. At this >> particular part in the code it is just about converting >> from/to widget/field value. So ignoreContext/ignoreRequest >> are not used anyway. (at least not to retrieve widget values). >> >> However, maybe it would be better to pass ignoreContex and >> ignoreRequest to the sub-widget, and let the sub-widget >> decide whether to ignore the context/request or not. This >> could especially be useful in other parts of the muti-widget code. >> > > Yes good idea, this makes sense to me. Can you commit this to the > trunk with a test? > > No sorry, I don't have commit access. I probably can implement the stuff mentioned above, and I can try to figure out a test case. At the end I can send a few patches :).
Regards, Gerhard > Regards > Roger Ineichen > _____________________________ > END OF MESSAGE > > _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
