Roger Ineichen wrote:
>>> I'm really not sure if this is working, but does this make
>> sense to you?
>>> Roger Ineichen
>> Thanks for the comment. For this particular use case it won't
>> work without the context,. The context is used to look up
>> further objects in the containment hierarchy. At this
>> particular part in the code it is just about converting
>> from/to widget/field value. So ignoreContext/ignoreRequest
>> are not used anyway. (at least not to retrieve widget values).
>> However, maybe it would be better to pass ignoreContex and
>> ignoreRequest to the sub-widget, and let the sub-widget
>> decide whether to ignore the context/request or not. This
>> could especially be useful in other parts of the muti-widget code.
> Yes good idea, this makes sense to me. Can you commit this to the
> trunk with a test?
No sorry, I don't have commit access. I probably can implement the stuff
mentioned above, and I can try to figure out a test case.
At the end I can send a few patches :).
> Roger Ineichen
> END OF MESSAGE
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -