Hi Roger,

Roger Ineichen wrote:
>>> I'm really not sure if this is working, but does this make 
>> sense to you?
>>> Regards
>>> Roger Ineichen
>> Thanks for the comment. For this particular use case it won't 
>> work without the context,. The context is used to look up 
>> further objects in the containment hierarchy. At this 
>> particular part in the code it is just about converting 
>> from/to widget/field value. So ignoreContext/ignoreRequest 
>> are not used anyway. (at least not to retrieve widget values).
>> However, maybe it would be better to pass ignoreContex and 
>> ignoreRequest to the sub-widget, and let the sub-widget 
>> decide whether to ignore the context/request or not. This 
>> could especially be useful in other parts of the muti-widget code.
> Yes good idea, this makes sense to me. Can you commit this to the
> trunk with a test?
No sorry, I don't have commit access. I probably can implement the stuff 
mentioned above, and I can try to figure out a test case.
At the end I can send a few patches :).



> Regards
> Roger Ineichen
> _____________________________

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to