On 03.08.09 20:15, Chris McDonough wrote:
> On 8/3/09 1:07 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
>> Marius Gedminas wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 08:48:24PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
>>>> the doctests for zope.index 3.5.2 - as used in Zope 2.12 - fail badly:
>>>> line 143, in textindex.txt
>>>> Failed example:
>>>> [(k, "%.4f" % v) for (k, v) in index2.apply("Zorro").items()] ==
>>> I'm assuming items() returns a plain Python dictionary with string keys.
>>> Python's string hashes return different valuesfor half of all the strings
>>> on 64-bit machines. This influences the ordering of dictionary keys and
>>> some other things too (such as the sequence of random numbers you get if
>>> you use a string as the seed).
>>> Add a sorted() on both sides and the test should pass.
>> Actually, those tests were plain insane and I've fixed them on the
>> trunk. I intend to make a new zope.index release today.
>> How insane were these tests? Well, the author of the tests noticed that
>> the C optimization produces different scores than the Python version,
>> and compensated for that in a way that dramatically reduced readability.
Is there a buildbot for the zope.* or ZTK packages testing them under Linux
32bit and 64 bit?
org:ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -