Hey, Jim Fulton wrote: > I think the KGS should define 3 categories of packages: > > - ZTK packages > > These are packages we maintain and expect people to build things on. > > - Test packages > > These are packages that build on the ZTK. These are used to test > the ZTK packages, but aren't part > of the ZTK.
Could you give an example ofa 'test package'? I'm having trouble thinking of what these might be. > - dependencies of ZTK packages or test packages. > Note that the ZTK should probably avoid non-third-party > dependencies that are not > part of the ZTK. There are some fuzzy cases, like ZODB and ZConfig. What would 'dependencies of ZTK packages or test packages' be? Aren't those third party packages? > I propose that any test infrastructure we come up with needs to handle > these 3 cases. In any cases, the test infrastructure needs to fix > version for all of the categories of packages and there needs to be a > formal process (uh, like tests passing :) for updating the > configuration. Could you say a bit more about what's motivating this proposal? Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
