On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Jim Fulton<j...@zope.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Stephan
> Richter<srich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu> wrote:
>> On Friday 14 August 2009, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> Thoughts?
>> Sounds good to me.
>>> BTW, in my zopetoolkit dev branch, I've created a kgs directory to
>>> hold the ztk.cfg file and a ztk kgs buildout.  If no one complains
>>> about this soon, I'll commit this to the trunk and this will become
>>> the official home of this info until we decide differently.
>> Why did you start using a new format for the KGS? I had written a lot of 
>> tools
>> for zope.kgs that are very handy when it comes to actually creating releases
>> and other things.
> This is discussed in another thread.
> Basically, it boils down to being simpler, less repetitive, and easier
> to work with.

BTW, I should have noted that the only tool I really care about is a
tool that correctly runs the KGS tests, which we haven't had until

- Runs each projects as a separate process to avoid test interference
and to catch missing dependencies.

- Uses the same project versions for all tests.


Jim Fulton
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to