On 18.09.09 18:18, Tres Seaver wrote: > Andreas Jung wrote: > > On 18.09.09 17:56, Tres Seaver wrote: > >> Two modules do a really complicated and ugly conditional import > dance to > >> try and make twisted availabe as an alternative to ZServer. > > Can you explain a bit more? > > >> I propose > >> we nuke that dance on the Zope trunk: at this point, we should prefer > >> to do WSGI well, and leave integrating a specific external server > out of > >> the core. > > You mean dropping the ZServer and Medusa? > > No, I mean dropping the experimental twisted alternative. ZServer is > battle-hardened, well-supported, and shouldn't need to be pulled out: > it allows for "standalone" use of Zope without any external integration. > > IIRC, the twisted integration code was added because Jim wanted us to > "get out of the server business." At this point, I think that folks > wanting an alternative to ZServer should focus on using WSGI to > integrate with the server of their choice; we should make that as easy > / smooth as possible, and ditch the (undermaintained / icky / old) > twisted integration. > I totally agree with your observation and consider the Twisted integration as mission-failed. Nothing objections from my side. If you don't see objections by others, just go ahead.
_______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )