On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Martijn Faassen <[email protected]> wrote: > Jim Fulton wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Martijn Faassen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Documentation in 'docs' would disqualify >>> just about any package (and Reinout brings up a few objections). >> >> I definitively want the option of making documentation executable.
... > So, I'd be against any "you can't contribute documentation unless it's > executable" rule. The value of narrative documentation is tremendous, > automatically checked or not. Hopefully there are also iterative ways to > get from non-executable to executable documentation. All I said was that I wanted the option of executable documentation. In particular, I don't want to mandate a source organization that makes this harder. Jim -- Jim Fulton _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
