On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Martijn Faassen
<faas...@startifact.com> wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Martijn Faassen
>> <faas...@startifact.com> wrote:
>>> Documentation in 'docs' would disqualify
>>> just about any package (and Reinout brings up a few objections).
>> I definitively want the option of making documentation executable.


> So, I'd be against any "you can't contribute documentation unless it's
> executable" rule. The value of narrative documentation is tremendous,
> automatically checked or not. Hopefully there are also iterative ways to
> get from non-executable to executable documentation.

All I said was that I wanted the option of executable documentation.
In particular, I don't want to mandate a source organization that
makes this harder.


Jim Fulton
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to