On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Martijn Faassen
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Martijn Faassen
>> <faas...@startifact.com> wrote:
>>> Documentation in 'docs' would disqualify
>>> just about any package (and Reinout brings up a few objections).
>> I definitively want the option of making documentation executable.
> So, I'd be against any "you can't contribute documentation unless it's
> executable" rule. The value of narrative documentation is tremendous,
> automatically checked or not. Hopefully there are also iterative ways to
> get from non-executable to executable documentation.
All I said was that I wanted the option of executable documentation.
In particular, I don't want to mandate a source organization that
makes this harder.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -