Thomas Lotze wrote: > Martijn Faassen wrote: > >> * zope.contenttype: we should analyze what is using zope.contenttype. > > Of the packages mentioned in ztk.cfg, zope.browserresource, zope.app.file > and zope.app.onlinehelp are. There's also zope.mimetype which seems to be > concerned with the same subject and is used by zope.file and zope.html, > and there's some MIME-type handling being done without using either > zope.contenttype or zope.mimetype by zope.publisher and possibly others. > Last time I looked, these different pieces of code didn't even treat > content type declarations consistently nor correctly wrt the relevant RfC. > I guess one might want to clean up this story as a whole.
Thanks for doing this analysis! It'd be great if you could turn this into a proposal for future actions... I'm surprised about the difference in dependencies between zope.file and zope.app.file: isn't zope.file an extracted version of zope.app.file? If not, we need to think about that too. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
