* 2009-10-12 08:55, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Perhaps it is an idea to make zope.component an extension for > repoze.zcml? repoze.zcml already exists and works well, and people who > want the extra zope magic can keep using zope.component. I suspect that > is less work than trying to split up zope.component.
repoze.zcml uses a different ZCML namespace (bfg), so you cannot replace zope.component.zcml with repoze.zcml without changing your code. Fabio _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )