* 2009-10-12 08:55, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Perhaps it is an idea to make zope.component an extension for
> repoze.zcml? repoze.zcml already exists and works well, and people who
> want the extra zope magic can keep using zope.component. I suspect that
> is less work than trying to split up zope.component.
repoze.zcml uses a different ZCML namespace (bfg), so you cannot replace
zope.component.zcml with repoze.zcml without changing your code.
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -