On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 14:41:14 +0200
Hanno Schlichting <ha...@hannosch.eu> wrote:
> Hi Sylvain.
> > I volunteer myself to add test (and fix it) in the SVN, as I need
> > that fix.
> > Does anyone have an objection with that ?
> No objection, please go ahead.
I added test for unregisterUtility, and fix the bug I encounter,
which happens only for utilities which inherit from Aquisition, and
have a physical path.
> > Does any official maintainer will do a release (1.1.1, as it will
> > be a bug fix) afterwards ?
> Sure, ping me once you are done and I'll cut a new release. Michael,
> do you want to test anything, before I do a new release?
If you have time, I guess it's ready for a release.
> > (of course, the trunk will need to be fixed if the same problem is
> > present, and no, I do not want to use the trunk, but the 1.x
> > branch).
> There were some changes to the registerUtility code on trunk
> (incorporating bug fixes from zope.component), but these had to do
> with re-registering utilities and the implicit unregister that happens
> during that.
> As unregisterUtility is still not overridden, I suspect the same
> problem still exits and your tests should show that.
Actually, I didn't need to override the unregisterUtility method
(which is better), I fixed the issue by adding a comparison one to the
wrapper (and this should work with all versions of zope.component
Sylvain Viollon -- Infrae
t +31 10 243 7051 -- http://infrae.com
Hoevestraat 10 3033GC Rotterdam -- The Netherlands
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -