Thomas Lotze wrote:
> Thomas Lotze wrote:
>> While writing tests for the module I'm moving to
>> zope.component, I notice that the module calls getSiteManager() on an site
>> object. Such an object isn't technically required to implement an
>> interface that declares that method, but there is one, or rather a pair of
>> them: IPossibleSite and ISite.
> I wonder: should we start requiring that the object passed to setSite()
> implement (or even be adaptable to) IPossibleSite?

I think the simplest way forward would be not to change the semantics as 
part of this step.



Zope-Dev maillist  -
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - )

Reply via email to