Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to just move IPubFailure before the abort? Is
> there a reason for subscribing to such an event which would required
> the transaction to be aborted already? I can see the usefulness of the
> transaction being already doom()ed before this event, but not aborted.

There is an IPubSuccess which runs after the transaction is closed. 
Doing post-processing after closure may be useful to keep transactions 
shorter and thus reduce the risk of conflict errors. I don't think an 
extra event will cost us much, so being consistent and granular is 
probably best.


Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who
want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book

Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to