Martijn Faassen wrote:

> Are people okay with the proposed semantics?

I am.

> Would people be okay with such an upgrade path? Any better ideas?

I'm not comfortable with the idea of an automatic fall-back for IFoo(x, y)
but maybe that changes after thinking about it some more.

> Most importantly, any volunteers?

I'd like to work on this.

-- 
Thomas



_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Reply via email to